
Hood (King Raven Trilogy, Book 1) by Stephen R. Lawhead
Well, I wasn't intending to ever list a fiction title here, but I may make exceptions for exceptional fiction. In this case though, I simply wanted to excerpt a short piece that I found quite interesting. This is from the section after the end of the book where Lawhead is explaining his decision to set his Robin Hood story in Wales.
In AD 1100, Gerald of Wales, a highborn nobleman whose mother was a Welsh princess, wrote of his people: "The Welsh are extreme in all they do, so that if you never meet anyone worse than a bad Welshman, you will never meet anyone better than a good one." He went on to describe them as extremely hardy, extremely generous, and extremely witty. They were also, he cautioned, extremely treacherous, extremely vengeful, and extremely greedy for land. "Above all," he writes, "they are passionately devoted to liberty, and almost excessively warlike."
Gerald painted a picture of the Cymry as a whole nation of warriors in arms. Unlike the Normans, who were sharply divided between the military aristocracy and a mass of peasants, every single Welshman was ready for battle at a moment's notice; women, too, bore arms and knew how to use them.
Within two months of the Battle of Hastings (1066), William the Conqueror and his barons, the new Norman overlords, had subdued 80 percent of England. Within two years, they had it all under their rule. However—and I think this is significant—it took them over two hundred years of almost continual conflict to make any lasting impression on Wales, and by that late date it becomes a question of whether Wales was really ever conquered at all.
In fact, William the Conqueror, recognising an implacable foe and unwilling to spend the rest of his life bogged down in a war he could never win, wisely left the Welsh alone. He established a baronial buffer zone between England and the warlike Britons. This was the territory known as the March.
Hmm, yes. It rather sounds like Hitler and the Nazis avoiding the near disaster that invading Switzerland would have been. On the other side, as an example of what not to do, the British mired in the American colonies in the years before 1776. The Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1970s and 80s is yet another example of what not to do. And it appears that we should also include the American Empire also in Afghanistan, as well as Iraq, to the list.
The Welsh (and the Swiss, for that matter) demonstrate that an armed citizenry has long been able to discourage, and defeat, tyrants. And the evidence of history shows that whenever someone wishes to disarm the citizenry, they should be looked upon, and treated, as the evil tyrant that they are.
Pingbacks:
No Pingbacks for this post yet...
This post has 5 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

















